CardiaNova, total artificial heart. Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University.
The bubble on every page and the same assistant as a whole page at /agent/<slug>, 22 ก.ย. It plans, calls read-only tools over the project's own data (the graph, the citation registry, the station values, the mechanical rows, the failure modes, the board, and a search over the team's documents), then answers. Every citation key is checked against the registry and against what the tools actually returned this turn, and a number that appears in neither is flagged. A conversation gets its own link, so it can be handed to someone who reads the thread and asks the next question. Typhoon, Thai or English, not medical advice.
27 ก.ย., for the design 1 and 2 session that night and the Final design meeting on 29 ก.ย.: the two design 1 tasks from the meet sum doc answered with computed numbers (impeller and chamber size against speed and room, port and vessel Reynolds numbers against Ton's own limits, the loss where a port meets its vessel, where the Hall sensors go on the stator), Ton's acceptance test scored on C1 to C5, and what Design 2 still owes. 28 ก.ย.: C5, the layout the team chose on the 27th (two sealed chambers, one stator in the wall, two rotors), in full detail. Thai, every number with its status.
1 ต.ค.: an overhead panel of 86 push-buttons, one per thing C5 needs, rows by system (whole heart, P1 to P7, the regulatory file), columns Constraint, Design, Simulation, Mock, then the later electrical, animal and clinical stages of the team's ISO 14708-5 roadmap. Every light computed from the files (design/c5_panel.py); press a button for the evidence, the owner and what lights it, and record the team's own state beside it (drop password).
29 ก.ย.: one hidden line drawing per part (four views, overall dimensions) projected from the built C5 solids, the bill of materials with the count of pieces, the assembly order, a first pass at the two windings (turns, wire, current, copper loss at the assumed flux), the performance the layout reaches as a TAH (head against speed, power, Reynolds at the ports) and every constraint check with its verdict. Thai, every number computed, SVGs downloadable.
28 ก.ย.: the layout the team chose on the 27th, split into eight work packages (housing, the stator wall, each rotor, the ports, the controller, the lining, the loss model) so each can be given to one person: the parts, the numbers two packages hand each other, the deliverable, and the owner. /public/c5-model shows C5 alone in 3D, exploded and built step by step. Owners are filled in design/c5_tasks.json.
23 ก.ย., for LN and the 27 ก.ย. design meeting: LN's page 3 layout (C1), Concept A's single disc (C2) and two separate pumps (C3), drawn as solids in the CT heart and answering Ton's six questions each: the frame the ventricles leave (about 576 cm3, 134 x 111 x 95 mm), where the rotor sits, radius against speed, coils and vanes, watts, materials. 27 ก.ย.: C4 (axial + centrifugal) and C5, the layout the team chose that night: two sealed chambers, one stator in the dividing wall with a winding on each face, two rotors held against it on a thrust film and a ceramic pivot, no shunt, balance by two speeds. STEP files that open in Shapr3D in /dropin/design/, models C1 to C5 on /public/cad, every number with its status in design/OPTIONS.md. A design exploration, not a device.
/public/implant, 22 ก.ย.: the surgical group's Draft 6 sequence, eleven steps from sternotomy to closure, played as a walkthrough on the same CT heart and the same BiVACOR geometry as /public/cad: the ventricles leave, the atria and the four valve rings stay, the cuffs go on, the device slides in along its own port axis to the docked pose, the streams start, the skin closes. Every card keyed to the papers the group cites (surgery/SURGERY-DRAFT6-2026-09-22.md); what is not on file (bone, cannulae, sutures) is said, not drawn.
/public/blood, 21 ก.ย.: the team's hemocompatibility draft (high shear, stagnation, recirculation, separation) mapped onto the drawing, laid out like /public/cad: the section fills the stage, levers in a side panel, one zone's detail in the inspector, the rest behind a Data drawer. Nine sliders recolour the section by risk and report tip shear against the 10, 50 and 150 Pa lines, passage Reynolds number, residence time and recirculation read off the measured low-flow pump, and inlet incidence, with the head each setting still makes against the duty. A matrix of mechanism against lever with every sourced cell, and Mahidol's CFD haemolysis beside the built device's measurement. Order estimates for ranking a change, not a CFD.
Ton counts what came back, before the 20:00 meeting. Trio: all three quests, 17:17, as two documents sent in chat (Heart_Hack.docx for T1 and T2, a PDF for T3), keyed in the same day and copied to /dropin/trio/. Non: runs 33 to 41 committed in the morning. Still to count: the written answers in /dropin/quest/ (empty at 17:00), Non's connection note, the small simulation run, and whether the university CFD machine exists. The fuller review follows about 25 ก.ย.
/quest opens with the gap map (nine stations by seven value groups, built from the heart data) and gives Non three quests with deliverable and acceptance criteria: N1 where each device attaches per the patent, its operating and failure conditions, and the pressure bands drawn on /public/heart; N2 pressure, velocity and Reynolds number at the nine points as SOURCED or checked DERIVED values, keyed through the build; N3 a small simulation run at 4 GB with real memory and time figures, a recommendation on continuum against particle, and whether the university CFD machine exists. Text and photos file into /dropin/quest/.
The gate that holds three cards in review. Open the CAD view with Colour by source on, walk the red parts, compare each against the patent figures and the IFU, and either fix heart_models.py or write down why the drawing is right. Then the 3D page and both PDFs can move to done.
Trio sent her three quests as documents rather than through the form, so her rows were keyed on Ton's side into trio/TRIO-T1-T3-2026-09-21.md (short TRI in nont_tables.py) and the pages quote that file directly. Nothing to re-key. Non's part: where her rows overlap his (right atrial and pulmonary artery pressures, the aortic diameters), check the two agree and say so in his file; and take the model order about the lungs if she sends one in LINE. Her 17 unsourced rows go back to her, never in as ASSUMED.
Arrived as two documents in chat (Heart_Hack.docx: T1 and T2 as tables for all nine stations; Task 3 summarized.pdf: T3 with ten sources). Every citation was resolved before it was keyed: 27 of 44 T1 rows and 22 of 31 T2 rows carry a source that resolves, all 10 T3 sources do. Three citations corrected from the record (first author, journal, a missing DOI). Now quoted on /public/heart, /public/cad and the gap map. Held back as questions to Trio: the filling pressures and valve gradients, everything at the pulmonary veins, the LA pressure, the MAP range, one textbook with no edition or page. Still owed from T2: the one page LVAD and TAH indication note with the three blood paths, and the evidence on Ton's ventricle claim.
Ton's task from LINE, 15 ก.ย. For IVC and SVC, right atrium, right ventricle, pulmonary artery, lungs, pulmonary veins, left atrium, left ventricle and aorta: what can go wrong, which indicator shows it (EKG, blood pressure, echo, catheter), and the normal against the abnormal value. One entry per finding, each with its paper. 21 ก.ย.: delivered in T2 for eight of the nine stations; the pulmonary veins say "not yet searched".
Berd's list from LINE, 17 ก.ย.: volumetric and flow; rate and rhythm; pressure profiles, left and right; inflow and filling pressures; fluid dynamics and hemocompatibility limits; mechanical durability and sizing. Start from what HEART-DESIGN-DATA.md already has so nothing is found twice. Every value Cited or Derived; an Assumed value is a question for the group, not an entry. 21 ก.ย.: T1 fills pressure, volume and flow, and size at most stations; rate and rhythm at none; the filling pressures came without a source.
1 ต.ค.: after the exams at the end of October; Ton runs it (his own case: an accounting assistant instead of a hire). แพรว and others asked for it. Berd finds one for engineering.
1 ต.ค.: accepted but not yet oriented; the engineering simulation of C5 waits on them (29 ก.ย.).
29 ก.ย.: กลิ่น's point that a rim of each valve ring is left after excision and a sewn material joins it to the device; SynCardia has a cuff and graft for it. Which material, how it is sewn, and how the inlet size follows the patient. The eleven steps on /public/implant show where it sits.
29 ก.ย., the chair's summary: everyone in Design finds and shares WPT ideas, the information so far is thin. On file: Concept A's chain (13.5 V supercapacitor bus, about 10 W into the skin at rest for C5) rests on a 0.70 link efficiency with no source, and Mahidol measured severe loss through 30 mm of pork. A sourced transcutaneous link efficiency is the gap.
29 ก.ย., the chair's summary, from Ativich's idea in the call: what the EKG looks like once the ventricles are removed (asystole, atrial rhythms), as a side study for the report. Nothing on file yet.
Nontakorn: set the maximum width, length and height first. ลมหนาว's under 200 mL is unsourced; the sourced envelope is BiVACOR's 60 by 70 mm and 650 g (MECHANICAL-FACTORS.md section 6).
A total artificial heart connects through four ports: two atria, aorta, pulmonary artery. Still open: where the wiring leaves the housing, and side by side against end to end.
Ton counts what came back, before the 20:00 meeting. Trio: all three quests, 17:17, as two documents sent in chat (Heart_Hack.docx for T1 and T2, a PDF for T3), keyed in the same day and copied to /dropin/trio/. Non: runs 33 to 41 committed in the morning. Still to count: the written answers in /dropin/quest/ (empty at 17:00), Non's connection note, the small simulation run, and whether the university CFD machine exists. The fuller review follows about 25 ก.ย.
/quest opens with the gap map (nine stations by seven value groups, built from the heart data) and gives Non three quests with deliverable and acceptance criteria: N1 where each device attaches per the patent, its operating and failure conditions, and the pressure bands drawn on /public/heart; N2 pressure, velocity and Reynolds number at the nine points as SOURCED or checked DERIVED values, keyed through the build; N3 a small simulation run at 4 GB with real memory and time figures, a recommendation on continuum against particle, and whether the university CFD machine exists. Text and photos file into /dropin/quest/.
The gate that holds three cards in review. Open the CAD view with Colour by source on, walk the red parts, compare each against the patent figures and the IFU, and either fix heart_models.py or write down why the drawing is right. Then the 3D page and both PDFs can move to done.
1 ต.ค., Berd: business must answer a judge's first question (what it is made of, what it does) before pricing anything. /start says it in plain words with the pipeline, the calendar and the glossary. All six, no single owner.
1 ต.ค.: what each brand's device and procedure cost (SynCardia, BiVACOR, Carmat, AbioCor; HeartMate 3 for scale), in THB with the rate used, entered on /public/c5-cost with the source link; no link, not used.
1 ต.ค.: the price of each of the 27 parts on the drawing set (titanium, magnets, steel, copper, ceramic, seals, the cannulas), per piece or per kg, entered on /public/c5-cost; the page sums the bill and shows how many parts are priced.
1 ต.ค.: five people (แพรว, หมิง, ยี่หวา and two the transcript did not catch): what stands in the way of selling a TAH, with references; feeds the challenge statement and the risk and insurance lines of the business model.
1 ต.ค.: four people (ฟง, พี่ต้น, the absent member and one more): what can be sold in low income countries and at what price, with references.
1 ต.ค.: the model for the business section: market analysis, brand comparison, cost per component, five year plan, roadmap, challenge statement, milestones. The competition's own template is not on file.
29 ก.ย.: the feedback on the earlier drawing was about the gap, Tiger raised it too. What the gap does (volume against speed, standing blood against shear), what tilt in degrees, and a first value to simulate with. The drawn gap is 4.3 mm radial and 0.3 mm axial on /public/c5-sheet; the vanes are drawn at 90 degrees as spoken. Also collects the answers to the All Design question list for 15 ต.ค.
29 ก.ย.: take the C5 material to the advisor before the 15th; the All Design question list is the deliverable; 1 ต.ค. onboarding for the new business and engineering members; schedule the engineering meeting so they simulate the design themselves and compare with Ativich's run.
29 ก.ย., the chair's summary: the PR team keeps the competition schedule updated and rechecked (New and Namping); report when registration and the round 1 list open. The Grand Final is about 20 ต.ค.
Cannula-to-cuff and outflow graft are not in the model; ALT missed all three recalls.
Live at /public/cad with parts tree, measure on click, exploded view, section plane, labels, walkthrough and the flow simulation. Done 15 ก.ย.: every number carries its source, a citation key opens the paper or patent, DERIVED opens the checked calculation, a guess is red on red, and the build refuses a value with none. Still to do: the physiological targets drawn as graphs, now that Trio's rows of 21 ก.ย. are on file (trio/ in the repo).
The bubble on every page and the same assistant as a whole page at /agent/<slug>, 22 ก.ย. It plans, calls read-only tools over the project's own data (the graph, the citation registry, the station values, the mechanical rows, the failure modes, the board, and a search over the team's documents), then answers. Every citation key is checked against the registry and against what the tools actually returned this turn, and a number that appears in neither is flagged. A conversation gets its own link, so it can be handed to someone who reads the thread and asks the next question. Typhoon, Thai or English, not medical advice.
27 ก.ย., for the design 1 and 2 session that night and the Final design meeting on 29 ก.ย.: the two design 1 tasks from the meet sum doc answered with computed numbers (impeller and chamber size against speed and room, port and vessel Reynolds numbers against Ton's own limits, the loss where a port meets its vessel, where the Hall sensors go on the stator), Ton's acceptance test scored on C1 to C5, and what Design 2 still owes. 28 ก.ย.: C5, the layout the team chose on the 27th (two sealed chambers, one stator in the wall, two rotors), in full detail. Thai, every number with its status.
1 ต.ค.: an overhead panel of 86 push-buttons, one per thing C5 needs, rows by system (whole heart, P1 to P7, the regulatory file), columns Constraint, Design, Simulation, Mock, then the later electrical, animal and clinical stages of the team's ISO 14708-5 roadmap. Every light computed from the files (design/c5_panel.py); press a button for the evidence, the owner and what lights it, and record the team's own state beside it (drop password).
29 ก.ย.: one hidden line drawing per part (four views, overall dimensions) projected from the built C5 solids, the bill of materials with the count of pieces, the assembly order, a first pass at the two windings (turns, wire, current, copper loss at the assumed flux), the performance the layout reaches as a TAH (head against speed, power, Reynolds at the ports) and every constraint check with its verdict. Thai, every number computed, SVGs downloadable.
28 ก.ย.: the layout the team chose on the 27th, split into eight work packages (housing, the stator wall, each rotor, the ports, the controller, the lining, the loss model) so each can be given to one person: the parts, the numbers two packages hand each other, the deliverable, and the owner. /public/c5-model shows C5 alone in 3D, exploded and built step by step. Owners are filled in design/c5_tasks.json.
23 ก.ย., for LN and the 27 ก.ย. design meeting: LN's page 3 layout (C1), Concept A's single disc (C2) and two separate pumps (C3), drawn as solids in the CT heart and answering Ton's six questions each: the frame the ventricles leave (about 576 cm3, 134 x 111 x 95 mm), where the rotor sits, radius against speed, coils and vanes, watts, materials. 27 ก.ย.: C4 (axial + centrifugal) and C5, the layout the team chose that night: two sealed chambers, one stator in the dividing wall with a winding on each face, two rotors held against it on a thrust film and a ceramic pivot, no shunt, balance by two speeds. STEP files that open in Shapr3D in /dropin/design/, models C1 to C5 on /public/cad, every number with its status in design/OPTIONS.md. A design exploration, not a device.
/public/implant, 22 ก.ย.: the surgical group's Draft 6 sequence, eleven steps from sternotomy to closure, played as a walkthrough on the same CT heart and the same BiVACOR geometry as /public/cad: the ventricles leave, the atria and the four valve rings stay, the cuffs go on, the device slides in along its own port axis to the docked pose, the streams start, the skin closes. Every card keyed to the papers the group cites (surgery/SURGERY-DRAFT6-2026-09-22.md); what is not on file (bone, cannulae, sutures) is said, not drawn.
/public/blood, 21 ก.ย.: the team's hemocompatibility draft (high shear, stagnation, recirculation, separation) mapped onto the drawing, laid out like /public/cad: the section fills the stage, levers in a side panel, one zone's detail in the inspector, the rest behind a Data drawer. Nine sliders recolour the section by risk and report tip shear against the 10, 50 and 150 Pa lines, passage Reynolds number, residence time and recirculation read off the measured low-flow pump, and inlet incidence, with the head each setting still makes against the duty. A matrix of mechanism against lever with every sourced cell, and Mahidol's CFD haemolysis beside the built device's measurement. Order estimates for ranking a change, not a CFD.
Trio sent her three quests as documents rather than through the form, so her rows were keyed on Ton's side into trio/TRIO-T1-T3-2026-09-21.md (short TRI in nont_tables.py) and the pages quote that file directly. Nothing to re-key. Non's part: where her rows overlap his (right atrial and pulmonary artery pressures, the aortic diameters), check the two agree and say so in his file; and take the model order about the lungs if she sends one in LINE. Her 17 unsourced rows go back to her, never in as ASSUMED.
Arrived as two documents in chat (Heart_Hack.docx: T1 and T2 as tables for all nine stations; Task 3 summarized.pdf: T3 with ten sources). Every citation was resolved before it was keyed: 27 of 44 T1 rows and 22 of 31 T2 rows carry a source that resolves, all 10 T3 sources do. Three citations corrected from the record (first author, journal, a missing DOI). Now quoted on /public/heart, /public/cad and the gap map. Held back as questions to Trio: the filling pressures and valve gradients, everything at the pulmonary veins, the LA pressure, the MAP range, one textbook with no edition or page. Still owed from T2: the one page LVAD and TAH indication note with the three blood paths, and the evidence on Ton's ventricle claim.
Ton's task from LINE, 15 ก.ย. For IVC and SVC, right atrium, right ventricle, pulmonary artery, lungs, pulmonary veins, left atrium, left ventricle and aorta: what can go wrong, which indicator shows it (EKG, blood pressure, echo, catheter), and the normal against the abnormal value. One entry per finding, each with its paper. 21 ก.ย.: delivered in T2 for eight of the nine stations; the pulmonary veins say "not yet searched".
Berd's list from LINE, 17 ก.ย.: volumetric and flow; rate and rhythm; pressure profiles, left and right; inflow and filling pressures; fluid dynamics and hemocompatibility limits; mechanical durability and sizing. Start from what HEART-DESIGN-DATA.md already has so nothing is found twice. Every value Cited or Derived; an Assumed value is a question for the group, not an entry. 21 ก.ย.: T1 fills pressure, volume and flow, and size at most stations; rate and rhythm at none; the filling pressures came without a source.
Berd's request, 29 ก.ย.; drawn 1 ต.ค. as C5M, the second model on /public/c5-model: the same shape with the ball pivots out; a titanium shroud on each impeller's tips carries two bias rings under three U cores sealed in a dry bay in each end wall, with three eddy current sensors per side, pulling the rotor off the wall against its motor's pull as the built device's bearing does. Placed, assembly checked, STEP in /dropin/design/. Open: radial support (the rim gaps are too wide for a hydrodynamic film), the bearing's stiffness and control, and Ton's condition that it be shown more stable than the ball.
29 ก.ย.: Fong now leans to polished titanium for the chambers (microspheres grow an uneven layer that may detach and need a vacuum furnace; PTFE peels; heparin does not last; pericardium calcifies) with diamond like carbon on the impellers as a new option, not yet priced. Package P7 on /public/c5 carries the list; prices and sources still owed.
29 ก.ย.: Ativich's Python model, three control schemes under six conditions (low preload, systemic and pulmonary afterload, a speed rise, sensor failure, power loss). His headline: oxygen delivery stays flat with two independent rotors as pulmonary resistance rises and falls with one chamber. Parked as reference until engineering has its own run; source code offered. Ativich is not on the roster sheet, so the card has no owner here.
MECHANICAL-FACTORS.md in the repo: the values that set pressure, flow and blood damage in a rotary pump, 27 factors, every number keyed to a source, 6 marked not sourced. For Nontakorn and Tiger to review on the 21st.
ลมหนาว presented the concept on 14 ก.ย.: continuous flow, centrifugal, magnetically levitated rotor, two electromagnet units. Nontakorn took the file to review. The reviewers' questions (size limit, poles, orientation, wiring exit, materials) are answered by the 21st in the LINE group.
Model A (HeartMate 3) and Model B (BiVACOR rotary TAH), 1:1 in mm, placed on a real heart failure heart from an open CT dataset. Every part named, exploded views, what every tube connects to, blood path animation and a lumped parameter flow simulation. Assumed values are red on the page. In review until Non checks the geometry.
HeartMate 3 taken apart into 12 numbered parts, what each tube connects to, and how it works. 7 A3 pages. Internal sizes the manufacturer does not publish are marked ASSUMED.
BiVACOR geometry from its patents and papers: exploded, assembled, cutaway, rotor, in the heart, and a part by part table with what each tube connects to. 9 A3 pages.
Volute 71 mm against a 60 mm envelope, rotor and vane datum undefined, 240 um clearance below the 250 um patent minimum. Not yet traced to source.
Full design-exploration study: ALT plan, Weibull fits, margins.
CardiaNova against HeartMate 3, parameter by parameter.
Interactive model. Every input lives in params.py.
3 of 5 topics pass. Two gaps: wrong seal modelled, ALT caught 0 of 3 recalls.
meetings/2026-09-18-trio-non-brief.md: who does what, where each piece lands, and how Ton reviews it. Handed out at the 30 minute Google Meet on 18 ก.ย. 20:00.
meetings/2026-09-18-trio-non-call.md, 23 minutes, transcript beside it. Ton asked Trio to teach the heart station by station and Non to find the device connection and the mechanical values; deadline Monday 21 ก.ย., 15:00 proposed and not confirmed; Non probably not at the 20:00 meeting, so work goes to Ton first and the AI prepares the presentation. Questions go to Non before Ton.
peers/MAHIDOL-CARDIATECH-2025.md, the 63 page final report of the Mahidol team (DBL-TAH: bladeless impeller, passive magnetic bearing, axial-flux motor, wireless power) read page by page: what they claim, what their own numbers show (CFD haemolysis eight times their target, motor under speed and overheating, wireless power failing through tissue, mock loop not yet run), what CardiaNova can use (their requirement table, mock-loop targets and cadaver measurements as leads, each with the page), and where the report contradicts itself. The PDF sits beside it in /dropin/peers/.
Decided 14 ก.ย.: continuous flow, not pulsatile; centrifugal, not axial or mixed; a permanent magnet in the rotor spun by commutated coils. Left and right pressures differ, so two drive units.
Sourced dimensions and operating data for a rotary total artificial heart. Every value keyed to a paper, patent or regulatory document.
10 page summary of the sourced research: BiVACOR data, the human side of both designs, and how each number was checked. Dated 10 September, before the 3D model work.
/public/heart: the CT heart in 3D with blood tracing the path from the venae cavae to the aorta. Tap a station for what it is, the normal values it must meet with their sources, the same values for a person of a given age, sex, height and weight, and a place to add a value with its citation. Works on a phone; each addition becomes a file in /dropin/trio/ that Non keys in.
Nothing here
Ton's roster sheet, 29 ก.ย. 2026. Design 1 and Design 2 are one Design team since 29 ก.ย. 2026, at Ton's instruction. The sheet lists them apart: Design 1 was Nont, P'Ton and Trio; Design 2 was Lomnao, P'Kaiau, Neya, Biw and P'Fong.
Design 1 and Design 2 on the sheet, one team since 29 ก.ย. Its work is on /public/design1, /public/c5 and /public/cad.
Their Draft 6 of 22 ก.ย. is keyed in surgery/ and played on /public/implant.
Six joined on 1 ต.ค.; แพรว leads (volunteered), Ton stays the bridge to design. First update 15 ต.ค.: what a TAH is, prices per brand and per component in baht with a link each, the challenges of selling, low income country markets. Its page is /public/c5-cost; newcomers start at /start.
Nobody yet, apart from Non: the sheet says so in as many words, and it is the hole Ton raised on 21 ก.ย.
Chairs the meetings and keeps the question list (14 and 21 ก.ย.). First on the sheet's roster and in no team. The card and the low-poly model on this page are archived work from before the device.
On the sheet under Business/Finance. No work items on the board yet.
On the sheet under Design 2, now the Design team. No work items on the board yet.
On the sheet under Surgical Techniques. No work items on the board yet.
Main designer since 14 ก.ย.: presented the design concept then, the revised device on 21 ก.ย., and led the Design 2 side of the 27 ก.ย. session (LN in the design files). On the sheet under Design 2, now the Design team.
Presented the materials block on 21 ก.ย. On the sheet under Design 2, now the Design team.
First year computer engineering. External device data, sourced and keyed, two reference devices drawn at real scale in 3D, and from 18 ก.ย. the one who puts the physiological values the medical side finds onto the simulator and the CAD view. On the sheet under Design 1, now the Design team, and the only person in Engineering.
PR and recruitment (14 ก.ย.). On the sheet under PR.
Owns the engineering side: the reliability study, the simulation, the CAD pages and the site. Writes the checklists, hands the work out, and checks what came back on Monday. On the sheet under Design 1, now the Design team, and Business/Finance.
In Dr Ohm's medical research group (14 ก.ย.). On the sheet under Surgical Techniques.
On the sheet under Surgical Techniques. No work items on the board yet.
On the sheet under Design 2, now the Design team, and Business/Finance. No work items on the board yet.
Medical evidence, the physiological targets and the surgical approach (14 and 21 ก.ย.). On the sheet under Surgical Techniques.
On the sheet under PR. No work items on the board yet.
First year MD, from Bangkok. Finds the physiological values a heart pump has to meet, station by station along the blood path, with what goes wrong at each and which indicator shows it. Works from a phone: entries go in from a station on /public/heart and land in the drop folder for Non. On the sheet under Design 1, now the Design team.
Year 4. Materials: the price and source of the blood contact lining, the 27 ก.ย. action item (C5 package P7). On the sheet under Design 2, now the Design team, and Business/Finance.
คณะบริหารธุรกิจ year 2, marketing. Volunteered on 1 ต.ค. to lead the business side; the first topics are the challenges of selling a TAH and the price table. Works in two week research rounds, next update 15 ต.ค.
คณะบริหารธุรกิจ year 2, international accounting; case competition experience; offered to help lead. Challenges of selling a TAH (1 ต.ค.).
คณะบริหารธุรกิจ year 2, marketing; first project. Challenges of selling a TAH (1 ต.ค.).
คณะบริหารธุรกิจ, marketing. Joined 1 ต.ค.; group not caught by the transcript.
คณะบริหารธุรกิจ year 1. Joined 1 ต.ค.; group not caught by the transcript.
คณะบริหารธุรกิจ year 1; has tried an AI coding tool. Joined 1 ต.ค.; group not caught by the transcript.
Board content lives in members.py. Edit it and run
build_board.py to update this page.